Wednesday 11 September 2013

New Theatre Done Right

I've said before that this is not a review site. I maintain that. Everyone else and their dog have a review blog.

However, as the concept of "new theatre" has come up many times here, in both posts and comments, I will say a few words about Home at the End.

I found this play, for the first production of a new play, brilliant. The subject matter was engaging, the differing manners of delivery were breaths of fresh air.  Were there some places where the cup of messages appeared to run over? Yes. Were there some moments of unnecessary philosophy? Sure. But you get that.

The important thing is that the play was new, directed by someone who knows theatre back-to-front and inside-out, and delivered with passionate commitment. If all "new" theatre were as engaging as HatE, (cool acronym, by the way), I don't see a reason for people to avoid the "new".

I suppose that what I consider to be the key to successful "new" theatre, and I'm aware that many people will disagree with me, is that you have to find an engaging way to send an important message, which Everyman did.

Being "new and innovate" for the sake of it, without any important message that the audience can access and relate to, is just artistic masturbation. And if you're just going to artistically masturbate for three hours, all you're going to be left with is sore arms, a chafing shaft and an unpleasant mess in the front row.

7 comments:

  1. I think in either case, whether you're being new and innovative or traditional and familiar, you're going to fail if you don't realise your first duty, above all, is to involve and interest the audience.

    If you're doing an old show in an old way that is just lugging the old warhouse out because it will sell... I'm going to be bored and I'm probably less likely to come back. Just as if you're doing a new show and it's all about you and nothing about what might be interesting to an audience ... I am not going to care.

    This may seem bloody obvious, but I've seen enough theatre where nobody seems to have really thought about how it might look to people who haven't spent 8 weeks in a rehearsal room to know that sometimes, the audience thing slips completely out of a production's mind...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rather off topic, but have either of you seen footloose? Want to know if its worth it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ha ha ha ha "either of you" ha ha ha ha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What a valid, intellectual and not-at-all uninteresting contribution.

      Delete
  4. Dissapointed no footloose review from "That Guy"

    ReplyDelete
  5. If you post that to HIS blog, you'll probably get a better answer...

    ReplyDelete